Legal Opinion

People v. Aponte

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided August 22, 2014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Judgment of conviction, rendered February 3, 2012, affirmed.

Observed by police urinating “in plain view” opposite a location identified as 2396 First Avenue in Manhattan, defendant was charged with “public urination,” in violation of the anti-littering provisions of New York City Health Code (24 RCNY) § 153.09, which, as here relevant, makes it unlawful to “throw or put any . . . noxious liquid . . . [or] allow any such matter to run or fall into any street [or] public place . . . .” Defendant pleaded guilty to a reduced littering charge {see Administrative Code of City of…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. People v. DumayNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. People v. AbdurraheemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. In re Daverus McQ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Foster (Daniel)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
  2. People v. Gomez (Cecilio)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API