Legal Opinion

Koepnick v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 16, 1988No. 1 CA-CIV 9147PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Presiding Judge.

There are two primary issues raised on appeal and one primary issue raised on cross-appeal. The issues presented on appeal are: (1) whether the trial court erred in granting Sears Roebuck and Company’s (Sears) motion for new trial on Max Koepnick’s (Koepnick) false arrest claim; and (2) whether the trial court erred in granting Sears’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (judgment n.o.v.) on Koepnick’s trespass to chattel claim. The issue raised on cross-appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying Sears’ motion for judgment n.o.v. on Koepnick’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Rancho Pescado, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Biddulph OldsmobileArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Yoo Thun Lim v. CrespinArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Fendler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. Adroit Supply Co. v. Electric Mutual Liability InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
  2. Lisa v. StromCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. In Re Bayerische Motoren Werke, AGTexas Supreme Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API