Koepnick v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROEB, Presiding Judge.
There are two primary issues raised on appeal and one primary issue raised on cross-appeal. The issues presented on appeal are: (1) whether the trial court erred in granting Sears Roebuck and Company’s (Sears) motion for new trial on Max Koepnick’s (Koepnick) false arrest claim; and (2) whether the trial court erred in granting Sears’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (judgment n.o.v.) on Koepnick’s trespass to chattel claim. The issue raised on cross-appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying Sears’ motion for judgment n.o.v. on Koepnick’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Rancho Pescado, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Biddulph OldsmobileArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Yoo Thun Lim v. CrespinArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Fendler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Adroit Supply Co. v. Electric Mutual Liability InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
- Lisa v. StromCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- In Re Bayerische Motoren Werke, AGTexas Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.