Legal Opinion

Voices for Choices v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 6, 2003No. 03-2735, 03-2766PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge, in chambers.

I have before me motions for leave to file amicus curiae briefs. Fed. R.App. P. 29. The status of the movants impels me to state publicly my reasons for denying the motions.

The defendants, telephone companies that do business in Illinois and that I shall refer to collectively as “SBC,” appeal from the district court’s ruling that portions of the Illinois Public Utilities Act are preempted by the provisions of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 that require owners of telecommunications network infrastructure, like SBC, to grant access to their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John H. Ryan v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. National Organization for Women, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and Others v. Joseph M. ScheidlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Georgia v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Heath v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. (In Re Heath)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. WildEarth Guardians v. ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. Sierra Club, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Bishop v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2015
  5. In re the Search of Information Associated with [redacted]@mac.com that is Stored at Premises Controlled by Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API