Legal Opinion

936 Second Avenue, L.P. v. Second Corporate Development, Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There is no basis to disturb the award. The appraisal was made pursuant to the procedure set forth in the parties’ lease. The appraisers averred that they complied with the Court of Appeals’ order that the net lease must be taken into account when valuing the demised premises (see 936 Second Ave. L.P. v Second Corporate Dev. Co., Inc., 10 NY3d 628 [2008]). The motion court properly determined that there was no evidence of fraud, bias or bad faith in the appraisal process. Nor was the award irrational. Absent such evidence, “the appraisal should stand” (Rice v Ritz Assoc., 88 AD2d 513, 514…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rice v. Ritz Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. 936 Second v. Second Dev CoNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Rice v. Ritz Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Bioenergy Dev. Group, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Bioenergy Dev. Group, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. Coral Realty, LLC v. Federal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  4. Matter of 101 W. 23 Owner I LLC v. 715-723 Sixth Ave. Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  5. Urban Commons 2 West LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API