Legal Opinion
Rice v. Ritz Associates, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 17, 1983PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (88 AD2d 513).
As to plaintiff’s contention that by virtue of the lease there was an effective transfer of the air rights of the Rice parcel to the Ritz parcel, thereby constituting an “incumbrance” on the Rice parcel within the contemplation of the appraisal procedure clause explicitly set forth in the lease which the prevailing appraisers failed to consider in their appraisal, we express no view with respect to it as this issue was not presented to or considered by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Telaro v. TelaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Farr v. NewmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Rice v. Ritz Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rifenburg v. Liffiton Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Bell v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Liberty Fabrics, Inc. v. Corporate Properties Associates 5Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Grosz v. Serge Sabarsky, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Perlbinder v. JakubovitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.