Legal Opinion
Advisory Opinion No. 331
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided July 9, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
To the Members of the Senate
Alabama Statehouse
Montgomery, Alabama 36130
Dear Senators:
We have received Senate Resolution No. 95, by which you request the opinion of the Justices as to whether House Bill 204, as amended and substituted, violates the provisions of Sections 61, 45, and 71 of the Constitution of Alabama, 1901.
Your Resolution reads:
“BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SENATE OF THE LEGISLATURE OF ALA*1116BAMA, That we respectfully request the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court, or a majority of them, to give this body their written opinions on the following important…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex parte PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
- Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Yeilding v. State Ex Rel. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- State ex rel. Troy v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Alabama Ed. Ass'n v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Fumo v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Fumo v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998