Legal Opinion

Advisory Opinion No. 331

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 9, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

To the Members of the Senate

Alabama Statehouse

Montgomery, Alabama 36130

Dear Senators:

We have received Senate Resolution No. 95, by which you request the opinion of the Justices as to whether House Bill 204, as amended and substituted, violates the provisions of Sections 61, 45, and 71 of the Constitution of Alabama, 1901.

Your Resolution reads:

“BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SENATE OF THE LEGISLATURE OF ALA*1116BAMA, That we respectfully request the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court, or a majority of them, to give this body their written opinions on the following important…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ex parte PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
  2. Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Yeilding v. State Ex Rel. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. State ex rel. Troy v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Alabama Ed. Ass'n v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Fumo v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Fumo v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API