Legal Opinion
PopCap Games, Inc. v. MUMBOJUMBO, LLC
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided July 30, 2010No. 05-10-00301-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice WRIGHT.
The Court has before it appellant’s motion to vacate the trial court’s order declaring its supersedeas bond insufficient. For the reasons that follow, we grant the motion.
The underlying case involves claims for breach of contract and fraud. After filing its appeal, PopCap filed a supersedeas bond in the amount of $5,400,000, along with $20,000 additional security. Mumbo-Jumbo then filed a motion in the trial court seeking to declare the amount of the bond insufficient, because PopCap did not include the amount of attorney’s fees awarded to MumboJumbo in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Nalle Plastics Family Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- Imagine Automotive Group, Inc. v. Boardwalk Motor Cars, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Fairways Offshore Exploration, Inc. v. Patterson Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Corral-Lerma v. Border Demolition & Environmental, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Fairways Offshore Exploration, Inc. v. Patterson Services, Inc. and Cudd Pressure Control, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.