Legal Opinion

Hannan v. Williamsburgh City Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.

This action is brought upon a contract of insurance, in which the property is described as follows:

“One two-story frame building and additions thereto, with shingle roof, occupied by assured as a dwelling, situate on the south side of, and known as No. 72, Winder St., Detroit, Michigan, including the foundations, gas and water pipes and fixtures, and all permanent fixtures for heating and lighting, as part of the building.”

*557On April 20, 1889, a fire occurred on the plaintiff’s premises, by which loss occurred to the plaintiff amounting to $1,769.64. Of this amount $873 was appraised for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aurora Fire & Marine Insurance v. KranichMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. English v. Franklin Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guthrie Laundry Co. v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  2. Willoughby v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API