Legal Opinion

State v. Skarsgard

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2008No. 20070223PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Rockwell Skarsgard appeals from two criminal judgments following a jury trial in which he was found guilty of resisting arrest, a class A misdemeanor, and being in actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (“APC”), a class C felony. We affirm the criminal judgments.

I

[¶ 2] On May 18, 2006, Skarsgard was cited for APC, driving under suspension, and resisting arrest. Deputy Kevin Nelson of the Ward County Sheriffs Department responded to a call from dispatch, reporting that a vehicle was parked in the middle of a county road northwest of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. RaywaltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. ValgrenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. SchroederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. IgouNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BethkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API