Legal Opinion
In Re Tammarine
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 30, 2009No. 14-34493PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
RICHARD L. SPEER, Bankruptcy Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on the Objection of the Debtor, Kristin Tam-marine, to Claim No. 2 filed by the Creditor/Claimant, Christine Urban. (Doc. No. 46). An evidentiary hearing was held to determine the validity of the claim. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court took the matter under advisement so as to afford time to give the arguments raised by the Parties further consideration. The Court has now had this opportunity, and finds, for the reasons set forth herein, that the Debtor’s Objection to Claim No. 2 should be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Raleigh v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Bankers Mortgage Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- In Re BurkettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- In Re KemmerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re: Marshall L. Rader and Barbara J. RaderUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Shapiro v. US Claims, Inc. (In re Welch)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014