Legal Opinion

Shapiro v. US Claims, Inc. (In re Welch)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 28, 2014No. Bankruptcy No. 12-58561; Adversary No. 13-4972Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING U.S. CLAIMS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING THE TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARK A. RANDON, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

US Claims, Inc. (“USC”) advances money to individuals with legal claims likely to have favorable outcomes. If a claim is successful, USC is repaid its advance— plus a significant pre-negotiated return on its investment; nothing is owed, if the claim is dismissed or money is not recovered. The arrangement is accomplished through a Purchase Agreement: USC buys an interest in some or all of the anticipated claim proceeds, to be repaid…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pittman v. Cuyahoga County Department of Children & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. State Mutual Life Assurance Company of America v. Deer Creek Park, Burnac Mortgage Investors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  4. Pluck v. BP Oil Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. CareToLive v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API