Legal Opinion

Young v. Detroit Terminal Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1938No. Docket No. 11, Calendar No. 39,955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff, alleging that she sustained damage hy reason of the automobile in which she was a passenger being struck by a train of the defendant railroad company, brought this suit to recover for injuries. There was a trial by jury and plaintiff prevailed. On defendant’s motion judgment non obstante veredicto was entered and plaintiff has appealed. This motion was granted upon the sole ground that under this record plaintiff was shown to be guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. This ruling presents the only question for review.

The following statement of facts is in accord with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Krouse v. Southern Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hickey v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Kraft v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Larsen v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. LeBlancMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Armstrong v. LeBlancMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API