Legal Opinion

Larsen v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929No. Docket No. 95, Calendar No. 32,407PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff, on his way to work, just before daylight, driving his automobile on a street in Flint, came to a railroad crossing of defendant. The crossing was protected by a lighted wigwag and a bell. The positive testimony, against which the negative testimony made no issue, is that as plaintiff approached the crossing the bell was ringing and the wigwag was operating showing a red light. The crossing was near a large automobile plant. The night shift was leaving, and the day shift entering. Many automobiles were in the street, to which plain tiff in driving gave his attention. A. sudden…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosenfeld v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Young v. Detroit Terminal RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API