Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wiggs v. Edgecombe County

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 1, 2006No. COA05-1330Published

1DissentGeer, Judge

The majority opinion overlooks the “well-established principle that municipalities, as creatures of the State, can exercise only that power which the legislature has conferred upon them.” Bowers v. City of High Point, 339 N.C. 413, 417, 451 S.E.2d 284, 287 (1994). *56Because of this principle, “[a] contract made by a municipality beyond its power is unenforceable.” Id., 451 S.E.2d at 288. The Supreme- Court in Bowers, while construing precisely the statutes at issue in this case, stressed: “The issue thus becomes whether the legislature authorized the city to enter contracts for separation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. O & M INDUSTRIES v. Smith Engineering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Bowers v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Taylor v. City of LenoirCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API