King v. District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
In Error to the Police Court of the District of Columbia. Arthur D. King was convicted of operating an automobile without a permit, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SMYTH, Chief Justice.
King was charged in the police court with operating an automobile in the District of Columbia without having obtained a permit to do so. The'trial was had upon an agreed statement of facts, the important parts of which are that the defendant, a bona fide resident of Virginia, at the time of his arrest was driving his own automobile in the city of Washington; that it had attached to it proper Virginia license tags, issued to him in accordance with the laws of that state, and that he had in his possession, and exhibited, a permit from the state of Virginia to operate a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co. v. MorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. Cerecedo Hermanos Y CompañiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold and Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Baender v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jeannette Lenkin v. District of Columbia, Morris Pollin v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Kurtz v. Capital Wall Paper Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Fred v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1929
- Janes v. JanesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922