Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Wohl, South & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 20, 1941No. 8 Div. 931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

S. M. Winton was for many years a merchant in what is known as the City of Decatur and indebted to the wholesale concern of Wohl, South and Company, which indebtedness, less payments from time to time, was finally reduced to judgment. The suit was begun in the month of March, and in May thereafter Winton conveyed to his daughter, Ruby M. Ryan, for a recited consideration of $1,200, certain lands containing sixty acres. Ruby Ryan was a young married woman, had previously taught school in the rural sections where her husband was a teacher. As part of the consideration it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Caples v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Williams v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Moog v. FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Williams v. DentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. May v. MathersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Franklin v. NunnelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. GielleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Oyama v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Oyama v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Sutlive v. HackneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API