Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Nunnelley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 18, 1941No. 6 Div. 903PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

The appeal is from a decree overruling •demurrer to the bill as amended.

As we read the amended bill it ■simply discloses an exchange of property between complainant and defendant Franklin and specifies certain damages sustained by complainant by reason of false representations of said Franklin. Nothing to the contrary appearing, defendant Franklin is presumably solvent, and if this were all, the remedy at law would be adequate .and the bill without equity. Williams v. Neal, 152 Ala. 435, 44 So. 551; Parker v. Ward, 224 Ala. 80, 139 So. 215; Neal v. Williams, 168 Ala.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. American-Traders' Nat. Bank v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Dowling v. GarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Ginn v. HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. Williams v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Rushton v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Yorke v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  4. Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. Virginia B. HaralsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Smith v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API