Legal Opinion
McKenzie v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Court of Appeals
Decided September 2, 2003No. A-02-054PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sievers, Judge.
The appellants (Firefighters) in this case are a group of 98 Omaha firefighters who contend that the January 1, 1998, merger of the Millard Suburban Fire Protection District (Millard) with the Omaha Fire Department (Omaha) triggered Omaha Mun. Code, ch. 23, art. III, § 23-148 (1980), so as to entitle them to a pay increase. Thus, in this action, the Firefighters are suing for equitable relief to collect the backpay they claim to be owed. This interlocutory matter is before this court because the City of Omaha (City) filed a motion to disqualify attorney John Fahey as the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richardson v. GriffithsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BarkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. EhlersNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Mutual Group U.S. v. HigginsNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- O'Neill Production Credit Ass'n v. MellorNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heckman v. MarchioNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Tapia v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Beller v. CrowNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- McKenzie v. City of OmahaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2006