Legal Opinion
Breakey v. Lindsey
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 19, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00620Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL BREAKEY, et al., No. 2:19-cv-00620-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 JOSHUA LINDSEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Joshua Lindsay, American Business 18 Brokers L.L.C., and American Business Brokers Utah L.L.C.’s (collectively “Defendants”) 19 Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 4) and Motion to Strike (ECF No. 7). For the reasons set forth 20 below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and DENIES Defendants’ Motion to 21 Strike as moot. 22 I. FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.