Legal Opinion

Schoening v. Board of Education

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnthony J. Di Giovanna, J.

In this article 78 proceeding petitioners request an order directing the respondent Board of Education of the City of New York to place the petitioners upon the Day High School Salary Schedule Ila, pursuant to section 514 of the by-laws of the respondent and to pay the petitioners the difference in salary actually paid them and the salary they should have been paid had they been placed on said schedule.

*959The record reveals the following facts: Prior to 1936 swimming teachers had been assigned annually from evening recreation or community centers ’ eligible lists and were compensated at per…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Mounting Finishing Co. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Matter of Park East Land Corp. v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Harman v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Shapiro v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Matter of Mare v. DillonNew York Court of Appeals · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of Education of Central School District No. 2 v. NyquistNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Schoening v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API