Legal Opinion

Board of Education of Central School District No. 2 v. Nyquist

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1969PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn T. Casey, J.

This is a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR.

Petitioner, the Board of Education of Central School District No. 2 of the Town of Oyster Bay, New York (herein the Board) has instituted an article 78 proceeding to set aside a decision of the respondent, the Acting Commissioner of Education (herein Commissioner). Petitioner contends the decision was arbitrary and capricious and was predicated upon errors of law. Respondent, in lieu of interposing an answer, has moved to dismiss the petition. The intervenor-respondent in this proceeding, Cora E. Cullen, was allowed to intervene by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matter of Levitch v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Cochran v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. Cochran v. LevyNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Wakefield v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Kramer v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Berthiaume v. SCHOOL COM. OF CITY OF WOONSOCKETSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  2. Fay v. South Colonie Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Fay v. South Colonie Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  4. Ossant v. MillardNew York City Family Court · 1972
  5. Tucci v. NyquistNew York Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API