Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dwyer v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1948No. Docket No. 52, Calendar No. 43,931Published

1ConcurrenceBoyles, J.

I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Butzel except as stated herein, and for the reasons stated herein.

In Packard Motor Car Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Comm., 320 Mich. 358, two members of this Court joined with Mr. Justice Sharpe in holding that Act No. 360, Pub. Acts 1947 (Stat. Ann. 1947 Cum. Supp. § 17.531), was intended to change the previous meaning of section 29 of the unemployment compensation act as regards the length of time an individual was disqualified from benefits when her unemployment was due to pregnancy.

In the same case Mr. Justice Butzel wrote that said Act No. 360…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Packard Motor Car Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API