Legal Opinion

King v. Cipriani

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HAMILTON, PJ.

Robert King, a child of less than seven years, brought an action through his mother to recover from Philip Cipriani for personal injuries.

At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence in the case, the court instructed a verdict for the defendant and judgment was entered on the verdict. This presents a question of law as to whether or not the plaintiff had produced sufficient evidence to justify a submission of the case to the jury.

The record discloses that the defendant below, who is also defendant in error here, owned and operated a bakery near the place where the Kings…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stinespring v. Natorp Garden Stores, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State v. HahnOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Leesman v. MoserOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Cantonzarite v. OhlanOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API