State v. Thomas
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
The appellee, Carl Anthony Thomas, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was convicted of first degree burglary with a prior. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion for a new trial and the state brought this appeal pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-1711 and § 13-1712. The trial court entered the following order:
“THE COURT FINDS that the defendant should be granted a new trial for the reason that substantial rights of the defendant were prejudiced by the manner in which the statements of Jerry D. Snow were presented in testimony; that the Court erred in allowing said statements to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. SimoneauArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- General Petroleum Corp. v. BarkerArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Pima County v. BilbyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Cano v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Peak v. AcunaArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- State of Arizona v. Robert FischerArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. MumbaughArizona Supreme Court · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.