Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1969No. 1867PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

The appellee, Carl Anthony Thomas, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was convicted of first degree burglary with a prior. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion for a new trial and the state brought this appeal pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-1711 and § 13-1712. The trial court entered the following order:

“THE COURT FINDS that the defendant should be granted a new trial for the reason that substantial rights of the defendant were prejudiced by the manner in which the statements of Jerry D. Snow were presented in testimony; that the Court erred in allowing said statements to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. State v. SimoneauArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. General Petroleum Corp. v. BarkerArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Pima County v. BilbyArizona Supreme Court · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cano v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. Peak v. AcunaArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State of Arizona v. Robert FischerArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. MumbaughArizona Supreme Court · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API