Legal Opinion
Pomeroy v. Noud
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1906No. Docket No. 26PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from Manistee; McAlvay, J. Bill of review by Louisa Pomeroy, Emelia Pomeroy Mackin, individually and as administratrix of the estate of John C. Pomeroy, deceased, and others, against Patrick Noud to set aside a.,decree for foreclosure of a mortgage and for an accounting. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
Some references to testimony will be necessary to an understanding of the case, and will be made. The opinion of the trial judge, however, so fully outlines the case that it is here set out at length:
“ In this case the complainant in her own behalf, also as administratrix of her father, John C. Pomeroy, together with the widow and heirs at law of said deceased, files her bill in the nature of a bill of review against the defendant, asking that a decree heretofore entered in this court, which this bill seeks to. review, be set aside and an accounting be had between Patrick Noud, defendant, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Quimby v. UhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Detroit Savings Bank v. TruesdailMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Barnard v. PatersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Sanford v. HainesMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Sherwood v. Central Michigan Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reynolds v. First Alabama Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Cappella v. Little (In Re Little)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- Murphy v. Merchants Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Herman H. Hettler Lumber Co. v. OldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.