Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Rochester Telephone Corporation, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners, a group of local telephone exchange carriers, seek review of two orders of the Federal Communications Commission. These orders-the Performance Review Order 1 and the Add-Back Order 2 -made several changes to the Commission’s scheme for regulating prices charged by local telephone companies for interstate access services. We deny the petitions for review because the orders are neither arbitrary nor capricious and have no impermissible retroactive effects.
I
A. Background
In 1990, the Commission implemented…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- District Hospital Partners v. Sylvia Mathews BurwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Directv, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, MCI Telecommunications Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Worldcom, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- United States Telephone Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, At&t Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Orloff v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.