Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 29, 1932No. Docket No. 51051Published

In respect of short sales of stock, gain or loss is ascertained by matching the short sale price against the cost of the covering purchase, even though the taxpayer at the same time maintains with the same broker a margin account containing similar shares previously purchased.

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT W. BINGHAM, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Bingham v. Commissioner

Docket No. 51051.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

27 B.T.A. 186; 1932 BTA LEXIS 1114;

November 29, 1932, Promulgated

In respect of short sales of stock, gain or loss is ascertained by matching the short sale price against the cost of the covering purchase, even though the taxpayer at the same time maintains with the same broker a margin account containing similar shares previously purchased.

Donald V. Hunter, Esq., for the petitioner.

J. E. Marshall, Esq., for the respondent.

STERNHAGEN

OPINION.

STE…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Provost v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Rosenthal v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Bingham v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
  5. Campbell v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API