Legal Opinion

(PS) Matthews v. Caliber Home Loans

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 7, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02463Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DESMAL S. MATTHEWS, No. 2:19–cv–2463–KJM–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING OPPOSITION AND RESETTING HEARING 13 v. (ECF No. 3) 14 CALIBER HOME LOANS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On December 9, 2019, Defendants removed this action from Sacramento Superior Court.1 18 (ECF No. 1.) Defendants then moved to dismiss, and set the matter for a hearing on January 16, 19 2020. (ECF No. 3.) 20 Pursuant to this Court’s Local Rules, Plaintiff was obligated to file and serve a written 21 opposition or statement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Kim King and Kent Norman v. Victor AtiyehCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. John Boutari and Son, Wines and Spirits, S.A. v. Attiki Importers and Distributors IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API