Legal Opinion

Jacobsen v. Sweeney

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 17, 1953No. 11445PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURTAM.

This appeal grows out of a suit for damages for breach of a written contract for sale of a business and a leasehold of .premises upon which the business was conducted. The leasehold, being for a term of years, was an estate or interest in land, a chattel real. D.C.Code § 45-801, 804 (1951). Accordingly, the agreement of sale, covering an interest in land, required a writing signed by the party to be charged. D.C.Code § 12-302 (1951).

An important question is whether an oral agreement of the parties extending the time for performance of the contract, covered by the writing, is valid…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sweeney v. JacobsenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. The Madison Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. Feltman v. SarbovDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Landow v. Georgetown-Inland West Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. 1330 Connecticut Avenue, Inc. v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Easter v. Kass-Berger, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API