Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Hood

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 12, 1997No. 96-0548; Crim.App. No. 9500624PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, in accordance with his pleas, of one specification of larceny and two specifications of false swearing, in violation of Articles 121 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 921 and 934, respectively. The adjudged and approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 18 months, and total forfeitures. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence in an unpublished opinion.

Our Court granted review of the following issue:

WHETHER THE…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. MacCullochUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. MoseleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  2. United States v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  3. United States v. CornettCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  5. United States v. KnightCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API