Legal Opinion
Kuzminsky v. Wagner Ex Rel. Fidelity & Guaranty Ins.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 24, 1952No. 1177PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Plaintiff sued for damages resulting from a collision between his automobile and the defendant’s. Defendant filed a counterclaim for his damages. On trial by the court without a jury there was finding and judgment in defendant’s favor on both the claim and the counterclaim. On this appeal plaintiff asks that the judgment be reversed on the ground that it was plainly wrong and without evidence to support it. 1
According to plaintiff’s testimony he was driving on Upshur Street at a speed of 15 to 20 miles an hour and about 15 feet ahead of him was another car traveling at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ross v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Tarrant Ex Rel. Tarrant v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Nolan v. WerthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Christiansen v. HollingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Seiler v. Phila. R. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Washington v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Tan Top Cab Company v. ShillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- McKnight v. BradshawDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Price Ex Rel. National Retailers Mut. Ins. v. DerricksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Du Bose v. DrummondDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.