Durso v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for the personal injuries that she sustained when 19 boxes fell off an overhead riser at defendant’s store, striking her. Following a nonjury trial, Supreme Court, applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, found defendant liable and awarded plaintiff $30,000 for past and future pain and suffering. We reject the contention of defendant that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is not applicable because the boxes were not within its exclusive control. The boxes were stacked four feet high…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dermatossian v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ciciarelli v. Ames Department Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Albrecht v. BedardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fields v. King Kullen Grocery Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Cubeta v. York International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Morgan v. SolomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Spivak-Bobko v. Gregory Arms, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Lopez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New York Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.