Legal Opinion

Hanna Iron Ore Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 12, 1946No. 4744PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOSCINSKI, District Judge.

Plaintiff filed suit to recover income taxe. claimed to have been unjustly, unlawfullj and erroneously assessed and collected. Defendant, by special and affirmative defenses, challenges this court’s jurisdiction to heat and determine the matter on its merits fot the reason that the claims for refund, as filed with the Commissioner, on which this action must rest, do not set forth specific grounds for recovery of the taxes alleged to have been paid, as required by Section 322 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev. Code, § 322, and the Regulations of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Angelus Milling Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Cudahy Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  4. United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Santa Cruz Building Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1976
  2. Bercut-Vandervoort & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  3. Thomas Nelson, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API