Legal Opinion

Bercut-Vandervoort & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 20, 1955No. C. D. 1730PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JohnsoN, Judge:

This case is before us on a motion to dismiss the protest for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that plaintiff has faded to file a claim for refund with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, as provided in section 3772 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U. S. C. §3772).

The subject matter of the suit is the amount of internal revenue taxes assessed upon the imported merchandise under section 2800 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U. S. C. §2800). Plaintiff admits that no claim for a refund was filed with the Commissioner but contends that section 3772 is not applicable.

Said…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cary v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Snyder v. MarksSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Auffmordt v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Arnson v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1883

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Czarnikow-Rionda Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Lazar v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Bercut-Vandervoort & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API