Legal Opinion
Creasy v. Stevens
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 19, 1958No. Civ. A. 13672, 13841PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in these actions before a statutory court 1 seek to have a statute of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Act of 1945, May 29, P.L. 1108, § 1 et seq., as amended, 36 Purdon’s Pa.Stat. Ann. § 2391.1 et seq. (hereinafter referred to as “statute”), as applied to them, declared violative of the Constitution of the United States, and to have the defendants, the Governor and Secretary of Highways of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, permanently enjoined from enforcing said statute. We think they are so entitled.
Most of the important facts have been stipulated. 2…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Martin v. CreasySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Wolf v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Adaman Mutual Water Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Muskegon Theatres, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. City of Muskegon, a Municipal Corporation, and the Amazon Company, a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.