Legal Opinion

Jack E. Merklein, Inc. v. Hohl

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 6, 1982No. AE-371PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Merklein, Inc. argues that the deputy commissioner erred in awarding claimant rehabilitation benefits pursuant to Sections 440.15(2)(b) and 440.49(1), Fla.Stat. (1977), arguing that because the rehabilitation counselor did not recommend a course of instruction for rehabilitative purposes, there was no evidence from which the deputy could conclude that such benefits should be awarded. We affirm.

Claimant’s accident occurred on February 16, 1978, resulting in his sustaining a 20% permanent partial disability (PPD) to the right arm which the employer/carrier voluntarily accepted, and paid…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hall v. Red Bishop RoofingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. All American Pools 'N Patio v. ZinnkannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. All American Pools 'N Patio v. ZinnkannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API