Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 13, 1991No. 9527PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendant’s motion to open and modify the judgment of dissolution. The opening and modification of the judgment affected all of the orders, but did not affect the decree of dissolution. The plaintiff contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant the defendant’s motion, filed more than four months after judgment, because there was insufficient evidence of fraud.

The parties’ nine and one-half year marriage was dissolved on January 6, 1989, following a hearing on the parties’ separation agreement. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Kenworthy v. KenworthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Artman v. ArtmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Celanese Fiber v. Pic Yarns, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Solomon v. KeiserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Richards v. RichardsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. Wilkes v. WilkesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. Cardona v. NegronConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API