A.P. v. Tuba City Family Court
Navajo Nation Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This case concerns the exclusion of a non-Indian minor who admitted a curfew violation in a juvenile delinquency proceeding. Based on the record and the arguments of the parties, we enter a permanent writ of mandamus. Our reasons are set out below.
I
This matter concerns A.P., a non-Indian child. The Office of the Prosecutor filed a delinquency action in the Tuba City Family Court alleging that A.P. committed a curfew violation under 17 N.N.C. § 531 (as amended by Navajo Nation Council Resolution No. CJA-08-00 (January 27, 2000)). According to the parties, the alleged violation occurred on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Two Initiative Petitions Filed by ShirleyNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2008
- Miles v. Chinle Family CourtNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2008
- Perry v. Navajo Nation Labor CommissionNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2006
- Wood v. Window Rock District CourtNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2009
- Acothley v. PerryNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.