Legal Opinion

A.P. v. Tuba City Family Court

Navajo Nation Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2005No. SC-CV-02-05PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case concerns the exclusion of a non-Indian minor who admitted a curfew violation in a juvenile delinquency proceeding. Based on the record and the arguments of the parties, we enter a permanent writ of mandamus. Our reasons are set out below.

I

This matter concerns A.P., a non-Indian child. The Office of the Prosecutor filed a delinquency action in the Tuba City Family Court alleging that A.P. committed a curfew violation under 17 N.N.C. § 531 (as amended by Navajo Nation Council Resolution No. CJA-08-00 (January 27, 2000)). According to the parties, the alleged violation occurred on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Two Initiative Petitions Filed by ShirleyNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Miles v. Chinle Family CourtNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Perry v. Navajo Nation Labor CommissionNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Wood v. Window Rock District CourtNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Acothley v. PerryNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API