Legal Opinion

Acothley v. Perry

Navajo Nation Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2011No. SC-CV-08-11PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND OMNIBUS ORDER AND WRIT OF SUPERINTENDING CONTROL

On January 26, 2011, Petitioners’ Counsel David Jordan filed an application to this court to issue a Writ of Superintending Control in order to disqualify the Special Prosecutor (SP) and Window Rock District Court judges, and dismiss the above cases. The basis for the application is delay in the proceedings, ex parte contact between Respondent Judge Carol Perry and the SP Alan L. Balaran, prosecuto-rial misconduct, and the SP’s unlicensed practice of law. At the time of this application, a motion for Mr. Jordan’s disqualification as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Beverly Roumph, Individually and as Next Friend of Lavina Roumph Lavina RoumphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Navajo Nation v. TsoNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API