Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Stallings

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 30, 1929No. Nos. 6700, 6701PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

The controlling question in this case is whether the petition set forth a cause of action in tort for wilful fraud and deceit, personal to the plaintiffs named therein. If so, the amendments allowed were germane, and the plaintiffs were proper parties to bring the suit, and the general demurrers were properly overruled. On the other hand; if the petition, properly construed, is' an action by the plaintiffs as a class for themselves and other creditors of the same class who may see proper to join the aetiou, for the recovery of deposits due by the bank and lost by the negligence,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Hines v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Gatewood v. . TomlinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Motlow v. Southern Holding & Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Geeen v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Wheeler v. American National Bank of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Castleberry v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. Black v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API