Legal Opinion
People v. Ferguson
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 16, 1990No. F011909PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VARTABEDIAN, J.
The People appeal the lower court’s order of dismissal. We reverse based upon the discussion that follows.
An information was filed on November 17, 1988, charging Ronny Keith Ferguson, respondent herein, with possession of amphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)), and possession of a nunchaku (Pen. Code, § 12020, subd. (a)). As to the amphetamine charge, it was further alleged that the offense was committed while respondent was armed with a firearm. (§ 12022, subd. (a).) Respondent was arraigned on the following day when he pleaded not guilty and waived…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Oberholzer v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. BraceyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Barsamyan v. Appellate Division of Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. Superior Court (Alexander)California Court of Appeal · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.