Legal Opinion

Compassion in Dying v. Washington

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 6, 1996No. 94-35534PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge BEEZER; Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD.

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

I

This case raises an extraordinarily important and difficult issue. It compels us to address questions to which there are no easy or simple answers, at law or otherwise. It requires us to confront the most basic of human concerns — the mortality of self and loved ones — and to balance the interest in preserving human life against the desire to die peacefully and with dignity. People of good will can and do passionately disagree about the proper result, perhaps…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Glenn v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Vacco v. QuillSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Vacco v. QuillSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. People v. KevorkianMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API