Legal Opinion
Glenn v. Washington County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 4, 2011No. 10-35636PublishedCited by 300 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The panel acknowledges the amended table of contents in Appellees’ corrected petition for rehearing, filed November 21, 2011. Appellees’ motion for leave to file a corrected petition for rehearing is DENIED.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
Appellees’ petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc, filed November 18, 2011, is DENIED.
The changes to the amended opinion filed concurrently with this order are non-substantive. Therefore, no further…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by300 opinions
- Kisela v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Gonzalez Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. City of AnaheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Richard Vos v. City of Newport BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- George v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
295 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.