Legal Opinion

Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway v. Peavler

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 18, 1910PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Edwards. Floyd superior court.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

At a certain point within the corporate limits of Borne the Southern Bailway crossed over the track of the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Bailway by means of a bridge. Peavler was a member of a bridge gang of the former company and was at work with others on the piers of the bridge beside the track of the latter railroad. A train of the former company passed over *620tile bridge. It was contended that it was dangerous to remain under it, and the hands stepped out to one side of it; that on account of the high embankments on each side and of water alongside the track, caused by a recent rain,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Metropolitan Street Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Bluedorn v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Brunswick & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Prewitt v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hieber v. WattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. City of Acworth v. Western & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Wright v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. City of Waycross v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API