Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 5, 1900No. 11,417PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Saline district court; R. F. Thompson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J. :

Our attention is called to a point that was not given sufficient consideration at the first hearing (60 Kan. 837, 58 Pac. 476), namely, whether perjury may be predicated upon an oath taken before a mere de facto officer.. After the record of appointment of T. B. Chapman as police judge had been produced, as'well as proof of qualification and possession of the office by him, the defense offered testimony tending to show a change of residence by him, and that he was therefore incapable of holding the office and not a de jure police…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  2. Texas v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. The People v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  4. State ex rel. Knowlton v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Lambert v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Markey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  2. Humphrey v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. In re CorumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. PrestonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. State v. BednarNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API