Legal Opinion
In re Kopel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 10, 1906PublishedCited by 9 opinions
On Habeas Corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, District Judge.
The relator is in the custody of the police ■of this city by virtue oí a warrant issued by the Governor of New York, directing that Kopel be seized and delivered to an officer described in the warrant as being duly authorized to take and convey him to Porto Rico, there to he tried for an offense against the laws of that island. The warrant of the Governor of this state was issued in response to a requisition from the Governor of Porto Rico, and both executives have, in issuing and honoring the requisition in question, acted in assumed compliance with section 5278, Rev.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Robb v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- People Ex Rel. Corkran v. . HyattNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Ex parte MorganDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Gildar v. KrissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pagett v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.