Legal Opinion

Laboratoires Perouse v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 10, 2007No. 06 Civ. 5276(RJH)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD J. HOLWELL, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

I. Procedural History

This is an action for patent infringement brought by Plaintiff Laboratoires Perouse, S.A.S. (“Perouse”) against Defendant Plaintiff W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. (“Gore”). Perouse alleges that Gore has infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,019,787 (“the '787 patent”) by making, using, selling, and/or offering for sale in the United States products including Gore’s TAG® thoracic endoprosthesis devices and EX-CLUDER® bifurcated endoprosthesis devices. (Compl.1ffl 9-10.) Gore has filed a counterclaim for a…

2Cases cited54 opinions

Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Wyeth, LLC v. Intervet, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
Constant Compliance, Inc. v. Emerson Process Management Power & Water Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009