Legal Opinion

AERO AG HOLDINGS, LLC v. SUMMIT FOOTWEAR CO., LTD.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 13, 2021No. 2:20-cv-16655Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY AERO AG HOLDINGS, LLC, Civil Action No. 20-16655 (WJM) Plaintiff, v. SUMMIT FOOTWEAR CO., LTD., and OPINION AEROSOFT FOOTWEAR USA LLC, Defendants. Falk, Chief U.S.M.J. This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants’ motion to stay this action pending the outcome of related proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. (CM/ECF No. 25.) The motion is opposed. The motion is decided on the papers. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion to stay is granted. BACKGROUND This is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Bechtel Corporation and Bechtel Power Corporation v. Local 215, Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. BordaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  4. J & J Snack Foods, Corp. v. Earthgrains Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. ChiorazzoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API