Legal Opinion

Penn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 2006No. ED 87648Published

1Opinion of the Court

209 S.W.3d 533 (2006)

Stanley D. PENN, Movant/Appellant,

v.

STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 87648.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

December 26, 2006.

Matthew M. Ward, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Lisa M. Kennedy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Judge.

The movant, Stanley Penn, appeals the dismissal of his pro se Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief by the Circuit Court of Gasconade County. The court dismissed the motion for two distinct reasons: because the court believed the motion…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wallingford v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  2. Tooley v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. Blanton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Penn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. PennMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API