State v. Penn
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Stanley D. Penn (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of distribution of a controlled substance, Section 195.211 RSMo (2000) 1 , and sale of a controlled substance, Section 195.211. The trial court sentenced Defendant to two concurrent six year terms of imprisonment. Defendant raises two points on appeal, claiming his right not to testify was violated and the trial court’s failure to act sua sponte resulted in manifest injustice.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Purcell v. JEROME L. HOWE, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
4Cited by3 opinions
- Penn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Purcell v. JEROME L. HOWE, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Penn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006